Showing posts with label edward the black prince. Show all posts
Showing posts with label edward the black prince. Show all posts

Friday, December 28, 2018

The Black Prince by Adam Roberts review

From The Guardian:

The Black Prince derives from a plan Anthony Burgess made for a novel in the early 1970s, and then turned into a screenplay for a film that was never made. It’s about the life and campaigns of Edward of Woodstock, eldest son of Edward III and father of Richard II, who defeated the French at Crécy and Poitiers, founded the Order of the Garter, and died of dysentery in 1376 before he could become king.

Image result for the black prince by adam robertsBrought out by crowdfunded publisher Unbound, this is a weird and wonderful book on which no commercial publisher would have taken a punt. Burgess said of his planned novel: “The effect might be of the fourteenth century going on in another galaxy where language and literature had somehow got themselves into the twentieth century.” Adam Roberts recreates that effect with panoramic camera swoops over Europe, inset newsreel headlines, and stream-of-consciousness accounts of the major battles of the century (Crécy, Poitiers, Nájera). These are voiced by a whole range of characters: if you want to see medieval Europe from the perspective of a blind king of Bohemia, a dog, a chicken seller, a Cornish miner, a mercenary, the mother of Richard III, or the Black Prince himself, this is the book for you.

read more here @ The Guardian

Saturday, May 12, 2018

Adam Roberts on Finishing an Unpublished Anthony Burgess Novel

The Black Prince“Edward the Black Prince is one of the most extraordinary figures in medieval history”, Roberts begins, giving us an idea of what to expect from The Black Prince, “if you read about him in a work of fiction you’d find him hard to credit: handsome, chivalrous, ruthless, with a string of extraordinary against-the-odds military victories to his credit, the first won when he was just 17. I knew Burgess had planned to write a novel about him in the 1970s, because he talked about it in an interview he gave to the Paris Review; and I was intrigued by how much of the project he drafted. So I got in touch with the estate and we ended up having a conversation about writing a novel based on his idea and the screenplay he wrote.”

read more here